{"id":5398,"date":"2026-10-07T01:00:18","date_gmt":"2026-10-07T04:00:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nextage.com.br\/blog\/?p=5398"},"modified":"2026-10-06T16:46:54","modified_gmt":"2026-10-06T19:46:54","slug":"software-factory-in-curitiba-how-to-choose-the-right-partner","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nextage.com.br\/blog\/en\/software-factory-in-curitiba-how-to-choose-the-right-partner\/","title":{"rendered":"Software factory in Curitiba: how to choose the right partner"},"content":{"rendered":"

Software projects rarely fail because of technology. They fail because of poor decisions made at the very beginning. A McKinsey study of more than 5,400 IT projects<\/a> found that large projects run, on average, 45% over budget and 7% over schedule, while delivering 56% less value than expected.<\/p>\n

For companies looking for a software factory in Curitiba, the challenge is not a lack of options. The city is one of Brazil’s most mature technology hubs, home to dozens of software development companies. The real challenge is having clear criteria to compare proposals that, at first glance, look the same.<\/p>\n

This guide is not a list of companies (for that, see our ranking of the best software factories in Paran\u00e1<\/a>). Here, the focus is on the decision method: 7 evaluation criteria, a scorecard to compare vendors, the right questions for your first meeting and the red flags that tell you to keep looking.<\/p>\n

\"Elevated<\/p>\n

Quick answer: how do you choose a software factory in Curitiba?<\/h2>\n

To choose a software factory in Curitiba, evaluate seven points: whether it runs a structured discovery phase before quoting; whether it has proven results in projects similar to yours; whether the team is in-house and stable; whether the process is transparent; whether there is dedicated QA; whether the contract guarantees SLAs, acceptance criteria and code ownership; and whether it offers ongoing support after delivery.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Structured discovery before the quote<\/li>\n
  2. Proven results in similar projects<\/li>\n
  3. In-house, stable and multidisciplinary team<\/li>\n
  4. Transparent process with frequent deliveries<\/li>\n
  5. Quality ensured by QA and automated testing<\/li>\n
  6. Contract with SLAs, acceptance criteria and client-owned code<\/li>\n
  7. Continuity after go-live<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    What a software factory is (and what it is not)?<\/h2>\n

    A software factory is a company that takes responsibility for delivering a complete system: discovery, architecture, design, development, testing, deployment and ongoing evolution. The client defines the business goal and tracks deliveries and metrics; team management stays with the vendor.<\/p>\n

    This is what sets the software factory apart from other engagement models, and understanding the difference prevents frustration on both sides.<\/p>\n

    Software factory vs. staff augmentation (outsourcing)<\/h3>\n
    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    <\/th>\nSoftware factory<\/th>\nStaff augmentation (outsourcing)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Responsibility for delivery<\/td>\nThe vendor<\/td>\nYour company<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Team management<\/td>\nThe vendor<\/td>\nYour company<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Best fit when<\/td>\nYou want a finished system with defined timelines and quality<\/td>\nYou already have technical leadership and need more team capacity<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    At NextAge, both paths are available: with the Software Factory<\/a>, NextAge is accountable for delivery and team management; with Outsourcing 2.0, your company receives vetted professionals who work under your management. To learn more, see our comparison between software factory and outsourcing<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Software factory vs. software house<\/h3>\n

    The terms are often used interchangeably. More important than the label is understanding which process the company proposes for your type of project; we explain the difference in this article on software factories and software houses<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Why hire a software factory in Curitiba?<\/h2>\n

    Curitiba offers two conditions that matter for companies outsourcing software development: a high concentration of talent and a well-established innovation ecosystem.<\/p>\n

    The numbers confirm the scale. According to a survey by Ipardes based on RAIS data<\/a> (Brazil’s official employment registry), Curitiba has 57,019 formal jobs in high and medium-high technology-intensive activities, 15,760 of them in information technology services alone. The city is also home to universities with strong engineering and computer science programs, such as UFPR, UTFPR and PUCPR, and an innovation ecosystem organized around Vale do Pinh\u00e3o<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    There is, however, a side effect: competition for talent. The Robert Half 2026 Salary Guide<\/a> reports that Curitiba, Londrina and Maring\u00e1 have nearly reached full employment, with technology among the hottest sectors in the state of Paran\u00e1. For a company planning to build an in-house team from scratch, this means slower hiring and a higher risk of turnover. A software factory reduces that risk by providing a ready-made team, with replacements guaranteed by contract.<\/p>\n

    With remote teams and well-defined follow-up routines, the factory’s location matters less than its process. NextAge, for example, was founded in Curitiba in 2007 and today serves companies across Brazil and in 13 countries, with progress tracked sprint by sprint.<\/p>\n

    Before you start: define your type of project<\/h2>\n

    The first selection criterion is not the company; it is the type of demand. Each scenario calls for a different engagement model, and proposals can only be compared when they start from the same model.<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Your scenario<\/th>\nBest-fit model<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Clear requirements and well-defined scope<\/td>\nFixed scope (defined price and timeline)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Digital product in continuous evolution<\/td>\nDedicated squad (exclusive team, fixed monthly fee and SLA)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Production system that cannot stop<\/td>\nSupport and evolution<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Idea still open, with many business variables<\/td>\nDiscovery before any quote<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    At NextAge’s Software Factory, these scenarios translate into three engagement formats: fixed scope, dedicated squad, and support and evolution<\/a>. When the client is not yet sure which one fits best, the project starts with discovery, and the format is recommended based on its findings.<\/p>\n

    7 criteria for choosing the right software factory<\/h2>\n

    1. Structured discovery before the quote<\/h3>\n

    Be wary of fixed proposals made after a single meeting. Without understanding processes, users, integrations and risks, any estimate of time and cost is a guess. The same McKinsey<\/a> study found that every additional year of project duration increases cost overruns by 15%; in other words, a poorly defined scope at the start becomes expensive at the end.<\/p>\n

    A good discovery phase delivers, at a minimum, a clear scope, a prioritized backlog and a realistic estimate of time and investment. That is why NextAge starts its projects with Deep Discovery<\/a>, which maps goals, users, processes, integrations and risks before the first line of code is written.<\/p>\n

    2. Proven results in similar projects<\/h3>\n

    The right question is not how many clients the vendor has served, but whether it has already solved a problem similar to yours. Compare the case studies presented with your project across three dimensions: industry, technical complexity and type of delivery (new system, modernization, integration or support). A relevant case study describes the challenge, the solution and the result in numbers.<\/p>\n

    An example of what to look for: at a fashion and luxury marketplace operating in 12 countries, a NextAge squad eliminated 89% of the technical backlog, resolved 100% of critical bugs and helped increase checkout conversion by 12%. Information at this level lets you assess whether the vendor’s experience applies to your scenario.<\/p>\n

    3. In-house, stable and multidisciplinary team<\/h3>\n

    A software project needs more than developers. Check whether the factory provides a project manager or Scrum Master, a software architect, a product owner or business analyst, front-end, back-end and mobile developers, DevOps, a UX\/UI designer and QA.<\/p>\n

    Also ask whether the professionals are in-house or subcontracted, and what the replacement policy is if someone leaves. Changing people mid-development is one of the most common causes of lost context and delays.<\/p>\n

    4. Transparent process with frequent deliveries<\/h3>\n

    You should be able to see the project’s progress without having to ask. Good signs include deliveries every two weeks with a demo of what was built, review meetings, access to the project board and a dedicated point of contact. This rhythm lets you adjust priorities early, before a small deviation becomes a big problem.<\/p>\n

    5. Quality ensured by QA and automated testing<\/h3>\n

    Quality cannot be left to the end. Ask whether there is dedicated QA, whether tests are automated, how code review works and what criteria define a delivery as done. If the vendor claims to use artificial intelligence in its process, ask at which stage and with what measurable result.<\/p>\n

    In NextAge projects, the Quality Center<\/a> ensures dedicated QA, automated testing and AI-assisted code review in every delivery.<\/p>\n

    6. Contract with SLAs, acceptance criteria and client-owned code<\/h3>\n

    Among all the clauses in a development contract, three deserve extra attention when comparing vendors: the SLA (for development and bug fixes), the acceptance criteria for each delivery, and the guarantee that source code, repository and documentation belong to your company. If a proposal does not address these three points clearly, it is not ready to be compared with the others.<\/p>\n

    For the full list of clauses to review, see our guide on software factory contracts<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    7. Continuity after go-live<\/h3>\n

    Software in production needs monitoring, fixes and ongoing evolution. Before hiring, understand how the vendor works after delivery: is there support with an SLA? Can the same team evolve the system? Is there enough documentation for another team to take over, if needed?<\/p>\n

    At NextAge, after deployment, AMS Support<\/a> takes over fixes, improvements and the continuous evolution of the system.<\/p>\n

    Scorecard: compare vendors on a 1 to 5 scale<\/h2>\n

    To take the decision out of the realm of impressions, give each criterion a score from 1 to 5 and multiply it by its weight. The weights below are a suggestion; adjust them to your project’s priorities.<\/p>\n

    \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
    Criterion<\/th>\nWeight<\/th>\nVendor A<\/th>\nVendor B<\/th>\nVendor C<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
    Structured discovery<\/td>\n20%<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Results in similar projects<\/td>\n15%<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    In-house, stable team<\/td>\n15%<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Process and transparency<\/td>\n15%<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Quality and testing<\/td>\n15%<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Contract (SLA, acceptance, code)<\/td>\n10%<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Continuity after go-live<\/td>\n10%<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
    Weighted score<\/strong><\/td>\n100%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

    A practical tip: have at least two people from your company fill in the scorecard (one from the business side and one from technology). Large gaps between their scores usually reveal points that still need to be clarified with the vendor.<\/p>\n

    10 questions to ask in your first meeting<\/h2>\n
      \n
    1. How do you arrive at your time and cost estimate? Is there a discovery phase?<\/li>\n
    2. Can you present a case similar to ours, with measurable results?<\/li>\n
    3. Can we speak with two or three current clients?<\/li>\n
    4. Who from the team presenting this proposal will work on our project?<\/li>\n
    5. Are your professionals in-house? What is your replacement policy if someone leaves?<\/li>\n
    6. How often will we receive deliveries and demos?<\/li>\n
    7. How does your quality process work? Is there dedicated QA and automated testing?<\/li>\n
    8. What is your SLA for fixing critical bugs?<\/li>\n
    9. Will the repository and documentation be in our company’s name from day one?<\/li>\n
    10. How do support and system evolution work after go-live?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      Red flags when hiring a software factory<\/h2>\n
      \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
      Red flag<\/th>\nWhat to ask for instead<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
      Fixed proposal with no discovery phase<\/td>\nA discovery that delivers scope, backlog and a well-founded estimate<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Generic timeline with no intermediate milestones<\/td>\nA schedule with deliveries and acceptance criteria for each stage<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Case studies with no numbers or unrelated to your project<\/td>\nExamples with problem, solution and results in similar projects<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Pitch team different from the delivery team<\/td>\nNames and profiles of the people who will work on the project<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Code hosted in the vendor’s repository<\/td>\nA repository in your company’s name from day one<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      No dedicated QA<\/td>\nA documented quality process with automated testing<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
      Price far below the other proposals<\/td>\nA breakdown of what is included and what was left out<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

      How much does it cost to hire a software factory in Curitiba?<\/h2>\n

      The investment depends on scope, integrations, platforms and engagement model; therefore, any figure presented before the project is understood should be treated as a preliminary estimate. For reference ranges in the Paran\u00e1 market, see our ranking of software factories in Paran\u00e1<\/a>.<\/p>\n

      More useful than comparing proposal prices is comparing total cost: the vendor’s price plus the time your team spends managing the project, fixing deliveries and re-explaining requirements. A cheaper proposal that leads to rework almost always ends up costing more than a proposal with a clear SLA and a well-defined scope.<\/p>\n

      At NextAge’s Software Factory, the discovery phase exists precisely to produce a realistic estimate of time and investment before development begins.<\/p>\n

      Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n

      How do you choose a software factory in Curitiba?<\/h3>\n

      Evaluate seven criteria: structured discovery, results in similar projects, an in-house and stable team, a transparent process, quality with dedicated QA, a contract with SLAs and code ownership, and support after delivery. Compare vendors using a weighted scorecard to make an objective decision.<\/p>\n

      How many software factories should I evaluate before deciding?<\/h3>\n

      Three to five is usually enough. Fewer than that limits the comparison; more makes the analysis slow and the proposals hard to compare. Use the same brief and the same scorecard for all of them.<\/p>\n

      Who in my company should take part in the selection?<\/h3>\n

      At least one person from the business side, who understands the problem to be solved, and one from technology, who evaluates architecture, process and quality. For larger projects, also involve legal and procurement at the contract stage.<\/p>\n

      Is it worth hiring discovery separately from development?<\/h3>\n

      Yes, especially when the scope is still open. Discovery produces a scope, backlog and estimate that can be used to compare proposals, and it reduces the risk of committing to a long contract based on weak assumptions.<\/p>\n

      Does the source code belong to my company?<\/h3>\n

      It should. Require in the contract that intellectual property, source code, repository and documentation be in your company’s name. At NextAge, these assets belong to the client, as set out in the contract.<\/p>\n

      How soon can a software factory project start?<\/h3>\n

      It depends on the vendor and the engagement model. At NextAge, once the proposal is approved, the team usually starts immediately or within a few days.<\/p>\n

      Can a software factory take over an existing system?<\/h3>\n

      Yes. The process starts with a technical assessment of the current system; based on it, the factory can take over support, evolve the system or plan its modernization.<\/p>\n

      Which technologies should a software factory master?<\/h3>\n

      The ones that fit your project. Be wary of vendors that impose a single stack for every need. A mature software factory works with a range of technologies, such as Java, .NET, Node.js, Python, React, Angular and Flutter, and chooses the most suitable one during discovery.<\/p>\n

      Conclusion<\/h2>\n

      Choosing a software factory in Curitiba is, above all, a decision about risk. The best partner is not necessarily the largest or the cheapest; it is the one whose process, team and contract reduce the chances of your project joining the statistics on delays and budget overruns.<\/p>\n

      Use the seven criteria, apply the scorecard and bring the ten questions to your meetings. That way, you stop comparing sales pitches and start comparing concrete ways of working.<\/p>\n

      Want to apply this method to your project? Talk to a NextAge Software Factory specialist<\/a> and start with discovery: you will leave the conversation with greater clarity on scope, timeline and investment.<\/p>\n